Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
×



Details

Submitted on
September 1, 2013
Image Size
2.2 MB
Resolution
4000×2664
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
304 (1 today)
Favourites
4 (who?)
Comments
23
Downloads
0

Camera Data

Make
Canon
Model
Canon PowerShot ELPH 100 HS
Shutter Speed
1/60 second
Aperture
F/2.8
Focal Length
5 mm
ISO Speed
250
Date Taken
Aug 31, 2013, 1:22:29 PM
Software
Microsoft Windows Photo Gallery 6.0.6001.18000
Sensor Size
6mm
×
Assault Phaser: Playmates vs. Copperhead (2) by galaxy1701d Assault Phaser: Playmates vs. Copperhead (2) by galaxy1701d
This is "Part 2" of the comparison between the late 1990's Playmates Toys version of the Assault or "Burning" Phaser seen in Star Trek V/VI and the "Copperhead Special" variant created for me by Casey Sullivan of Triple-Fiction Productions, a fan film and propmaking company based in Florida.

The Playmates Toys version of the prop, which I bought from eBay for only $32.00 (that's a steal for one of these), was never made in very large quantities even when it first came out. When I was a child, I remember only ever seeing one of them on the shelf at Toys R' Us - and, of course, my parents wouldn't let me have it. These days, this popular design is so rare - and coveted - that it tends to start bid wars on eBay the moment a listing pops up.

The toy-prop is not full-sized. It's probably only about 2/3 the size of the real prop, which was built from prop versions of the Beretta M93R machine pistol and still retains parts of the frame and controls from the 20th century handgun whose functions as "Phaser components" were not and still haven't been fully explained. Therefore, it looks notably smaller than the Copperhead Special, and does not feel quite right in my hand as it's a bit too small, causing me to grip the very top part of the detachable "magazine" (the battery compartment) when holding the prop.

However, it does have some "functionality." The Playmates toy has an opening slide (although there is no Phaser 1 inside that can be removed). Two "firing modes" can be selected. One triggers a single burst, the other a triple-burst. When the trigger is pushed, the prefire chamber, barrel tip and force setting indicator on the rear of the weapon all light up (this indicator is replaced by a green decal sticker on the "Copperhead Special" stunt prop). Even the battery cover could be counted as "functional" because the real prop used a magazine-like power cell that dropped like the magazine of a real-life handgun. Unfortunately, it doesn't have a belt clip and therefore I have to find a way to holster it when I'm carrying it around (the real ones were worn by threading their handles through loops attached to an actor's uniform, usually somewhere on the belt).

On the other hand, the "Copperhead Special" is a totally unique prop. It is a hardwood piece, so it has much more weight and feels far more solid than the Playmates toy, which is largely hollow - but it is a "stunt" or "dummy" prop, which means that it's pretty much entirely solid wood and has no functionality whatsoever. It's proportionally larger than the Playmates prop, but does not really look like it's bigger at first glance because part of the simplification that went into this design involved eliminating the oversized bottom part of the magazine that extended past the bottom of the handgrip, consequently reducing a good portion of the prop's height.

The redesigned color scheme, including silver highlights on all control surfaces and exposed knobs, was intended to make these details - and the prop's "layered" texturing - stand out on camera and give the piece a more "dynamic" appearance compared with the plain flat black of the Playmates toy and the real prop, which tends to drown out all of the details on the piece. Furthermore, the "Copperhead Special" has no need of a holster. I can easily carry it on my belt because it's got a belt clip attached to the right side of the weapon by two screws.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconboggeydan:
BoggeyDan Featured By Owner Aug 24, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Man, I never thought a Playmates rendition of the ST V/VI hand phaser actually existed. And judging from your comments, trying to get one will be like dealing with some unscrupulous Ferengi! D:

Though I do own the Playmates Abramsverse hand phaser myself, at least it's nice to see that it's a nice amalgam of various hand phasers from Primeverse Kirk's era (at least that's how I see it). :XD: 
Reply
:icongalaxy1701d:
galaxy1701d Featured By Owner Aug 24, 2014
Hello again!  It's been a while.  

That's right, the Playmates version of the Assault Phaser did exist, but it was extremely rare.  I suspect they didn't make that many of them because they figured that all kids of the time really knew was TNG/DS9/VOY, so they didn't focus that much on the classic stuff.  I have only seen a Playmates Assault Phaser on store shelves once, when a single Toys R' Us in the '90s had just one of them, and of course, Mom wouldn't let me get it.  

Given its rarity, its vintage status and the fact that it's still far cheaper than buying a resin garage kit or, Q forbid, the Master Replicas version, I can see why so many people still get into bidding wars over it on eBay even though it is actually too small, the red lighting is not accurate (it should be blue), the battery compartment doesn't look like a full power pack (magazine) and there's no P1 inside that slide.  If you see someone carrying an Assault Phaser at a "Star Trek" convention, chances are it's going to be that Playmates toy.  

Of course, now that I have the Copperhead Special, a unique, redesigned Assault Phaser created to my own personal specifications, my own Playmates Assault Phaser has been permanently retired.  I will never use it again. =P

I think you're right about the Abrams hand Phaser as well.  I have the ST:09 art book, and I can tell from the other attempts to design the hand Phaser that they did start from established Phaser pistol designs and then start playing around with those.  Some of the early concepts resemble the TOS more closely.  One had a little bit of the ST3 in it as well.  
Reply
:iconhernameisdren:
HerNameIsDren Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2013
I'm sitting here wondering if maybe the toy was just made to be more comfortable in smaller hands.  I wonder what ages they were targetting.  Surely fans of all ages would want one though.
Reply
:icongalaxy1701d:
galaxy1701d Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2013
Trust me, fans of all ages do want the Playmates Assault Phaser simply because of how rare it was.  It was never made in large quantities, so whenever one pops up on eBay, it tends to start a vicious bid war and so, even if they don't have the packaging or the included paperwork, they often sell for anywhere from $60 to $80, shipping included.  I was lucky to nab mine from a Buy-It-Now listing (so no bid wars) at only $32.00 plus shipping.  I couldn't believe it and to this day I'm still convinced that seller didn't know the true value of what they were parting with.  I've only used my Assault Phaser once, at Ichibancon 2012.

As for the purpose of the Playmates toy's scaling?  Most people who have the toy, myself included, actually think your idea is exactly what happened.  Although the Playmates toy/props are frequently used at conventions and photo shoots to this day, because they are readily available, often not too expensive and pretty durable, they are still just that - toys.  Playmates was making these toys to sell to kids, and so they probably downscaled the massive Assault Phaser prop to fit better in a child's hand.  It doesn't work quite that well in my 26-year-old hands, though. =(
Reply
:iconhernameisdren:
HerNameIsDren Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2013
Yeah, I'm glad you were able to get that.  Sometimes sellers don't know the value of things.  Sometimes they sell so many kinds of different products too that they don't always have time to learn.  Maybe the guy got the phaser  in a big lot of stuff and said to himself "Toy gun.  Some kid might want this.  Bet this retails for about $32 at Toys R Us" :-D
Reply
:iconhernameisdren:
HerNameIsDren Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2013
As for the prop not having "functionality", that's unfortunate, as I'd suspect that some functionality would handy in a real movie prop (for example lights that might light up on tricorders and communicators and stuff) as _everything_ is not going to be added later by the FX department (some things would just be done better as part of the prop I would think)....  Of course if a person is just going to walk around a science fiction convention with one on their belt (for example) and never actually try to "fire" the weapon ("I think I was in the autograph line ahead of you buddy :-D"), then a lot less "functionality" is actually needed.  To have anything light up on a gun when not actually in use after all is just not something The Federation would do.  After all, why expend power on a device that isn't currently in use? :-) ... A communicator, on the other hand, I'd expect to be more like a cellphone.  I might see a flashing (or perhaps not) light maybe to indicate that the device is "even on" on something.
Reply
:icongalaxy1701d:
galaxy1701d Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2013
With regard to functionality, that's a really intriguing comment because there are often big differences between "hero" and "stunt" props as "hero" props are used for close-up shots and frequently have fully functional features - usually mechanical features like the TOS Phaser's extending barrel and the lifting panel on the P1.

As for the Assault Phaser, from what references we've got, the original props did have red lights installed in the emitter tips, but those had a practical purpose as they showed the SFX people where to put the "Phaser beam" in post-production.  Other than that, the "hero" Assault Phasers also had opening slides and their magazines/power cells could clip in and drop out.  The props were actually heavily modified from prop Beretta M93R machine pistols, so I can only imagine that there may have been a number of greeblies that had function on the original Beretta handguns but no longer obviously did anything on the Phaser.  I wonder if they still did anything when pushed or toggled after they were "carried over" from the Beretta to the Assault Phaser props.
Reply
:iconhernameisdren:
HerNameIsDren Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2013
Fascinating.  Makes sense to me.  You got a cast of say 8 crewmembers in a planet scene and all of them need to have their "standard issue" phasers on their belts, but all of them don't need to actually work.  It's undoubtedly more expensive to make a "hero" prop, so as you are implying, there's no reason for most of these phasers to do anything at all :-D  ... It's not like they are suddenly going to be attacked by extra additional Klingons that weren't in the original script :-D
Reply
:icongalaxy1701d:
galaxy1701d Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2013
That's right.  Also, what about scenes where some super-strong being is shown crushing a Phaser, or if a Phaser needs to get destroyed for some other reason?  You can't wreck a Hero, they're way too expensive.  If you actually look at most of of the preserved "Midgrade" or "Stunt" TOS Phasers, you'll find that the Stunt ones look so awful that even the cheapest toy Phasers we have today would still be far better quality than the stunt prop - but the stunt prop wasn't seen up close, and chances are you, as a viewer, couldn't tell the difference on screen - so it still did its job while saving the film crew money.
Reply
:iconhernameisdren:
HerNameIsDren Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2013
Yeah... That's true.  The prop (or even uniforms) doesn't need to be anymore detailed than what the camera will capture.
Reply
Add a Comment: